8:30PM, OPTIONAL, CO-ED: THREADS OF INFAMY, BIBLE STUDY, POTLUCK, FILM

Focus Scriptures:

  • Genesis 4:3-16 (Cain and Abel)

  • Joshua 7 (Achan’s Sin)

  • 2 Samuel 11-12 (David and Bathsheba)

  • Matthew 26:14-16, 47-50 (Judas’ Betrayal)

Study Format:

This study will examine notable instances of dishonor, sin, and betrayal in the Bible, not to sensationalize wrongdoing, but to plainly consider the ripple effects on individuals, communities, and God’s overarching plan. We will compare these examples, explore the responses of surrounding characters, and reflect on God’s justice, mercy, and instruction.

Group members should read the provided scriptures, following the questions to discuss themes without opinion-based interpretations. Pair each discussion question with shared reflections, built on the insights noted after group members present their thoughts.

STUDY SCHEDULE & QUESTIONS BY PASSAGE

1. Genesis 4:3-16 - Cain and Abel

Group Questions:

  1. What differences existed between Cain’s and Abel’s offerings to God (v.3-5)?

  2. How does God address Cain’s anger and warning in verse 7? What challenge is issued?

  3. What do Cain’s actions reveal about his response to God’s statement?

  4. Examine God’s direct communication and response to Cain (v.9-15). What stands out?

  5. How does Cain describe his punishment in verse 13, and why is that significant?

Notes
This passage demonstrates an unrepentant heart and its consequences. Cain disregards God’s provision for reconciliation before acting, which results not only in his personal judgment but also in familial and societal fracture. The final verses show both the severity of God’s justice and His merciful provision through the mark meant to protect Cain from vengeance.

2. Joshua 7 - Achan’s Sin

Group Questions:

  1. What was Achan’s transgression, and how did it defy God’s commands (v.1)?

  2. What connection is made between Achan’s sin and Israel’s defeat against Ai (v.4-5)?

  3. How does God reveal the reason for the defeat to Joshua (v.6-12)?

  4. What was required to address the sin in Israel (v.13-15)?

  5. Reflect on Achan’s confession and its consequences (v.19-26). What lessons emerge?

Notes
This chapter highlights the communal impact of individual sin. Achan’s actions, though seemingly isolated, directly affected the entire nation of Israel. God’s instructions to identify and eliminate sin from among His people further demonstrate the importance of obedience and accountability in relationship to Him.

3. 2 Samuel 11-12 - David and Bathsheba

Group Questions:

  1. What were David’s initial choices leading to his sin (11:1-4)?

  2. How did David attempt to cover his actions (11:6-17)?

  3. What role did Nathan play in bringing the truth to David (12:1-7)?

  4. Examine David’s response after being confronted (12:13). What does it reveal?

  5. What consequences for David’s sin does God outline, and how are they fulfilled (12:10-14)?

Notes
Here, we see how sin can compound without repentance, as David’s deceit escalates to murder. God’s use of Nathan to confront sin underscores His desire for repentance rather than condemnation. David’s confession, while sincere, does not remove the consequences of his actions, highlighting both the far-reaching effects of sin and God’s ultimate justice.

4. Matthew 26:14-16, 47-50 - Judas’ Betrayal

Group Questions:

  1. What motivations led Judas to betray Jesus for thirty pieces of silver (v.14-16)?

  2. How does Judas’ interaction with Jesus in verse 50 deepen the betrayal?

  3. Consider Jesus’ foreknowledge of Judas’ actions. How does it frame His response?

  4. What did Judas’ choice mean in the context of prophecy?

  5. How does Judas’ story challenge us in our understanding of God’s plan and human free will?

Notes
Judas’ betrayal exemplifies both human sinfulness and the divine plan. The Gospels portray Judas as fulfilling prophecy while simultaneously choosing to act in greed and deceit. This tensions raises questions about responsibility and redemption, particularly in light of Judas’ later remorse.

Encourage the group to compare and contrast these examples of infamy in Scripture. Consider how God responds to sin in ways that reflect His justice and mercy. Reflect on the personal and communal effects of dishonor, seeking areas where God calls us to accountability, repentance, and restoration in our own lives.

8:30PM, OPTIONAL, CO-ED: THREADS OF INFAMY, BIBLE STUDY, POTLUCK, FILM

Focus Scriptures:

  • Genesis 4:3-16 (Cain and Abel)

  • Joshua 7 (Achan’s Sin)

  • 2 Samuel 11-12 (David and Bathsheba)

  • Matthew 26:14-16, 47-50 (Judas’ Betrayal)

Study Format:

This study will examine notable instances of dishonor, sin, and betrayal in the Bible, not to sensationalize wrongdoing, but to plainly consider the ripple effects on individuals, communities, and God’s overarching plan. We will compare these examples, explore the responses of surrounding characters, and reflect on God’s justice, mercy, and instruction.

Group members should read the provided scriptures, following the questions to discuss themes without opinion-based interpretations. Pair each discussion question with shared reflections, built on the insights noted after group members present their thoughts.

STUDY SCHEDULE & QUESTIONS BY PASSAGE

1. Genesis 4:3-16 - Cain and Abel

Group Questions:

  1. What differences existed between Cain’s and Abel’s offerings to God (v.3-5)?

  2. How does God address Cain’s anger and warning in verse 7? What challenge is issued?

  3. What do Cain’s actions reveal about his response to God’s statement?

  4. Examine God’s direct communication and response to Cain (v.9-15). What stands out?

  5. How does Cain describe his punishment in verse 13, and why is that significant?

Notes
This passage demonstrates an unrepentant heart and its consequences. Cain disregards God’s provision for reconciliation before acting, which results not only in his personal judgment but also in familial and societal fracture. The final verses show both the severity of God’s justice and His merciful provision through the mark meant to protect Cain from vengeance.

2. Joshua 7 - Achan’s Sin

Group Questions:

  1. What was Achan’s transgression, and how did it defy God’s commands (v.1)?

  2. What connection is made between Achan’s sin and Israel’s defeat against Ai (v.4-5)?

  3. How does God reveal the reason for the defeat to Joshua (v.6-12)?

  4. What was required to address the sin in Israel (v.13-15)?

  5. Reflect on Achan’s confession and its consequences (v.19-26). What lessons emerge?

Notes
This chapter highlights the communal impact of individual sin. Achan’s actions, though seemingly isolated, directly affected the entire nation of Israel. God’s instructions to identify and eliminate sin from among His people further demonstrate the importance of obedience and accountability in relationship to Him.

3. 2 Samuel 11-12 - David and Bathsheba

Group Questions:

  1. What were David’s initial choices leading to his sin (11:1-4)?

  2. How did David attempt to cover his actions (11:6-17)?

  3. What role did Nathan play in bringing the truth to David (12:1-7)?

  4. Examine David’s response after being confronted (12:13). What does it reveal?

  5. What consequences for David’s sin does God outline, and how are they fulfilled (12:10-14)?

Notes
Here, we see how sin can compound without repentance, as David’s deceit escalates to murder. God’s use of Nathan to confront sin underscores His desire for repentance rather than condemnation. David’s confession, while sincere, does not remove the consequences of his actions, highlighting both the far-reaching effects of sin and God’s ultimate justice.

4. Matthew 26:14-16, 47-50 - Judas’ Betrayal

Group Questions:

  1. What motivations led Judas to betray Jesus for thirty pieces of silver (v.14-16)?

  2. How does Judas’ interaction with Jesus in verse 50 deepen the betrayal?

  3. Consider Jesus’ foreknowledge of Judas’ actions. How does it frame His response?

  4. What did Judas’ choice mean in the context of prophecy?

  5. How does Judas’ story challenge us in our understanding of God’s plan and human free will?

Notes
Judas’ betrayal exemplifies both human sinfulness and the divine plan. The Gospels portray Judas as fulfilling prophecy while simultaneously choosing to act in greed and deceit. This tensions raises questions about responsibility and redemption, particularly in light of Judas’ later remorse.

FINAL REFLECTION

Encourage the group to compare and contrast these examples of infamy in Scripture. Consider how God responds to sin in ways that reflect His justice and mercy. Reflect on the personal and communal effects of dishonor, seeking areas where God calls us to accountability, repentance, and restoration in our own lives.

FOLLOWING THE STUDY

After our Bible study, we will be gathering for a potluck and casual cinema time together. For the potluck, you’re encouraged to bring an all-American-inspired dish — think chili cheese dogs, burgers, fries, or anything fun and indulgent that fits the theme. Of course, you’re welcome to bring any dish of your choice if something else sparks your creativity. It’s a relaxed, come-as-you-are opportunity to enjoy food and fellowship.

Next, we’ll be watching Don't F**k with Cats: Hunting an Internet Killer on Netflix. This compelling docuseries follows a group of determined internet sleuths who band together after disturbing videos surface online involving animal cruelty. Their amateur investigation ultimately uncovers connections to a shocking murder and sets in motion a thrilling, high-stakes manhunt with riveting twists and unexpected conclusions. The series explores themes of justice, morality, the dark sides of digital connectivity, and our responsibilities in the face of evil.

Below are 10 reflection questions for group discussion after viewing:

  1. How did the group of internet users balance their sense of justice with the dangers of vigilantism?

  2. What role did technology and social media play in both enabling and curbing immoral acts in the story?

  3. How would you assess collective responsibility when it comes to witnessing immoral actions online?

  4. Did the pursuit of the perpetrator spark an ethical line being crossed by the investigators? Why or why not?

  5. How do the events of the series challenge us to think about the power and dangers of anonymity on the internet?

  6. Were there warning signs in the perpetrator's early behavior that, if addressed, may have changed the outcome?

  7. How might this series lead us to reflect on supporting real-world accountability for harmful behavior?

  8. What lessons can be drawn about the role of community, even digital, in addressing and combating injustice or wrongdoing?

  9. How does the notion of justice portrayed in the series align (or differ) with Biblical perspectives on justice and mercy?

  10. After watching, how might you approach sharing or reacting to disturbing content online in a way that prioritizes integrity and positive outcomes?

We look forward to spending a great evening with good food, deep discussions, and meaningful insights together!

Previous
Previous

Interview: Lights, Camera, Recovery: Mitchell Royel on "Dolorosa," Top Hats, and Finding His Magic Again

Next
Next

Interview: Bowling, Beaches, and Bravery — How Malibu’s Athleisure Sect Reset Mitchell Royel’s Life