Unorthodox Affinities: Right-Wing Masculinity and Tate McRae's Aesthetic Directness

abr, 2025 - #nowplaying, greedy, it’s ok i’m ok

By written by a member of the WCB (JD)

In the ever-evolving landscape of contemporary music consumption, a curious cultural phenomenon has emerged worthy of scholarly attention: the enthusiastic embrace of Tate McRae's sophomore album "Think Later" by young conservative men. As someone who has long observed the intersection of political identity and cultural preferences, I find this cross-demographic appeal particularly fascinating and revelatory of our current moment.

When "Greedy" first entered the cultural zeitgeist in September 2023, I observed a notable shift among young men whose musical tastes typically gravitate toward traditionalist genres—country, classic rock, perhaps the occasional foray into the heartland authenticity of artists like Zach Bryan. Suddenly, McRae's trap-pop inflected track was infiltrating their carefully curated playlists. This warranted deeper investigation into what elements of McRae's artistic expression were resonating across expected cultural boundaries.

The conservative aesthetic sensibility, contrary to reductive characterizations, has always valued authenticity and directness—qualities abundant in McRae's work. "Think Later" presents itself without pretense; its production is sophisticated yet transparent, avoiding the obfuscating layers of artifice that often characterize contemporary pop productions. The album's trap-pop and alternative R&B influences serve the emotional core of the songs rather than functioning as trendy affectations.

Consider "Exes," released as the second single in November 2023. The track's thesis of decisive separation from past entanglements resonates with conservative philosophical leanings toward clean breaks and forward momentum. A colleague with whom I regularly engage in discussions on constitutional originalism remarked that the song's emotional clarity felt "refreshingly decisive" in an era characterized by ambiguity and equivocation.

"Run for the Hills," which served as the third single accompanying the December 8 album release, further exemplifies this connection. The track's thematic exploration of individual agency and self-determination aligns seamlessly with conservative values privileging personal responsibility and autonomy. The narrative arc of breaking free from constraining circumstances to forge one's own path functions almost as a musical manifestation of classical liberal individualism.

The meritocratic undertones of McRae's biography similarly appeal to conservative sensibilities. Her emergence from competitive dance—reaching the finals of "So You Think You Can Dance" at the precocious age of thirteen—represents the kind of talent-driven, discipline-forged success story that resonates with those who believe in earned achievement. Her trajectory exemplifies the conservative ideal that exceptional talent combined with rigorous application should rightfully yield success.

The production philosophy behind "Think Later" also warrants examination. Co-executive produced by Ryan Tedder, the album's concise 38-minute runtime across 14 tracks demonstrates an almost Apollonian restraint. This efficiency of expression—maximum impact with minimal excess—parallels conservative economic and governmental philosophies that privilege streamlined effectiveness over bloated expansiveness. Each track serves a purpose; nothing is extraneous or self-indulgent.

Tracks such as "Hurt My Feelings" and "Stay Done" have found particular resonance among young conservative listeners. The unflinching directness in lyrics like "Baby, please believe me/I'll put you through hell/Just to know me" presents a refreshing counterpoint to the perception of an increasingly euphemistic cultural discourse. In an intellectual climate often characterized by circumlocution and strategic ambiguity, McRae's linguistic precision offers a clarifying alternative.

The album's creation process further exemplifies values that align with conservative sensibilities. The curation of 14 final tracks from an initial corpus of approximately 100 compositions demonstrates a commitment to discernment and excellence that rejects participation-trophy inclusivity. This ruthless editorial process privileges quality over quantity, excellence over mere adequacy—principles fundamental to conservative cultural critique.

While critical reception has been generally favorable—Metacritic assigns the album a score of 70 out of 100—the popular response has proven more enthusiastic than critical assessment might suggest. This discrepancy between institutional critical reception and public embrace mirrors conservative skepticism toward self-appointed cultural arbiters and preference for market-determined value.

What makes McRae's music particularly accessible across ideological lines is its avoidance of didacticism. Unlike much contemporary cultural production, "Think Later" does not position itself as a vehicle for social commentary or political messaging. It concerns itself with the universalities of human experience—relationships, personal growth, emotional resilience—presented without ideological framing. This absence of overt political positioning creates a neutral space where listeners across the spectrum can engage with the work on its artistic merits.

The album title itself—"Think Later"—suggests a philosophical prioritization of instinct and action over excessive deliberation, a concept that resonates with conservative critiques of overthinking and analysis-paralysis in contemporary culture. In an era where young conservative men often report feeling constrained by elaborate social codes and speech regulations, this conceptual framework offers a liberating counternarrative.

Even the album's visual presentation deserves consideration. The cover art depicting McRae in hockey leg pads presents a distinctly Canadian visual metaphor that eschews the hypersexualization often characteristic of female pop artists' imagery. This straightforward, athletic representation avoids the usual tropes of the genre in favor of something more substantive and less calculated.

The Think Later World Tour, announced in November 2023 with 53 dates spanning three continents from April to November 2024, has attracted attention from demographics not typically associated with pop concert attendance. This commercial success across traditional demographic boundaries suggests that McRae has tapped into something transcendent of the usual cultural sorting mechanisms.

This cross-demographic appeal reminds us that artistic resonance can transcend the increasingly rigid boundaries of our cultural-political landscape. When artistic expression achieves a certain level of authenticity and excellence, it can bridge divides that seem insurmountable in more explicitly political contexts. McRae's work demonstrates that even in our hyperpartisan era, certain forms of cultural expression retain the power to connect across increasingly calcified ideological lines.

In a cultural moment characterized by fragmentation and antagonism, the enthusiastic reception of "Think Later" among young conservative men offers a compelling case study in unexpected points of connection. Perhaps there is something to be learned from this phenomenon about the potential for artistic expression to transcend the limitations of our current discourse—a reminder that beneath our political identities lies a common humanity responsive to authentic expression, regardless of its source.

(Urban Perspective) Floyd & kirk: When Violence Claims Another American Life

written by a member of the WCB

In our neighborhoods, we’ve grown too familiar with the sound of gunshots. Violence has long been a plague in urban communities across America. But when conservative activist Charlie Kirk was gunned down on September 10th at Utah Valley University, it showed once again that violence recognizes no boundaries – suburban or urban, conservative or progressive.

Parallels We Cannot Ignore

As someone who has witnessed how violence shatters lives in urban communities, the killing of Charlie Kirk resonates in unexpected ways. While Kirk – a 31-year-old conservative media figure with close ties to President Trump – moved in circles far removed from urban America, his death by gunfire connects to a shared American experience.

The scene unfolded in broad daylight. Kirk was speaking under a white gazebo to a crowd of about 3,000 people. He had just responded to a question about gun violence when a single shot rang out from a rooftop nearby. The crowd scattered in terror – a reaction all too familiar to those who’ve lived in neighborhoods where shootings are not political events, but regular occurrences.

Beyond Political Lines

In our communities, we’ve long advocated that no life should be ended by violence – regardless of who that person is or what they believe. The same protection we demand for Black lives must extend to all Americans.

The shooter, described as “college-aged” by authorities, blended into the campus environment before climbing to a rooftop position. He escaped into surrounding neighborhoods after the shooting – neighborhoods not unlike those where countless unsolved shootings have left families without justice or closure.

Urban Lens on American Violence

From our perspective in urban America, Kirk’s killing reinforces what we’ve known for generations: violence is America’s epidemic. While our communities have faced disproportionate levels of gun violence, the targeting of political figures shows how deeply this disease has penetrated American society.

FBI investigators found messages scrawled on the rifle recovered after the shooting – messages related to cultural issues. The politicization of violence is something urban communities understand all too well, having seen how violence against us is often framed through political and cultural lenses.

Moving Forward Together

As the FBI continues its manhunt, we’re reminded that no American – urban or suburban, Black or white, conservative or liberal – should live in fear of violence. The same protections we’ve demanded for George Floyd and countless others must extend to Charlie Kirk and all America.

In our urban communities, we’ve always known this truth. Now, perhaps in this moment of shared vulnerability, America will finally listen.

Setting the Record Straight: Charlie Kirk, Democrats in the Political Crossfire

written by a member of the WCB

Addressing Unsubstantiated Claims About Democrats

In the world of political discourse, rumors often circulate faster than truth. Recent whispers suggesting that Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA were funded by Democrats are nothing more than baseless speculation. Kirk founded Turning Point USA in 2012, with initial support from Republican donors like Foster Friess, a prominent conservative supporter.

Real Story of Turning Point USA

Kirk’s journey began in Prospect Heights, Illinois, where he was inspired by Tea Party member Bill Montgomery to pursue political activism full-time. The organization quickly grew as a conservative student movement.

Navigating Democratic Speculation and Conservative Advocacy

Voice for a Generation

Kirk became a powerful voice for young conservatives, addressing challenges facing Gen Z and Millennials. He boldly stated, “The basic things our parents enjoyed are increasingly out of reach for Gen Z and Millennials. You see, the American dream has become a luxury item for the wealthy elite.”

Key Achievements

• Founded Turning Point USA at just 18 years old

• Created initiatives like the Professor Watchlist to challenge perceived liberal bias in education

• Helped mobilize young voters during the 2024 election

• Expanded conservative outreach through multiple platforms, including his popular podcast

Inspiring Young Conservative Minds

Kirk’s approach went beyond traditional activism. He formed Turning Point Action and Turning Point Faith, aimed at mobilizing religious communities and political advocacy. His ability to connect with young conservatives made him a unique and influential figure in modern political discourse.

Legacy of Passionate Advocacy

Despite criticism from Democrats and other political opponents, Kirk remained committed to free speech, free markets, and limited government. He continued to challenge political narratives, speaking at colleges and universities across the country.

The spirit of Charlie Kirk lives on through the countless young conservatives he inspired to engage, think critically, and stand up for their beliefs.

In the face of rumors and Democratic speculation, truth and passion always prevail.

Evolving Conservative Perspective on 9/11: Call for Unity and Reflection

written by a member of the WCB

As we approach the 24th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, a notable shift in conservative thought is emerging, particularly among younger generations. This evolution in perspective is not about diminishing the significance of that fateful day, but rather about refocusing our collective energy on healing and unity.

For years, the conservative narrative surrounding 9/11 has been dominated by themes of national security, counterterrorism, and unwavering patriotism. However, a growing number of conservative thinkers, especially on college campuses, are advocating for a more nuanced approach to remembering this tragic event.

The core of this new perspective lies in recognizing the enduring pain of families who lost loved ones on that day. As time passes, the immediate shock of the attacks has given way to a deeper, more personal form of grief for those directly affected. Conservative leaders are increasingly emphasizing the importance of supporting these families through prayer and community action, rather than solely focusing on the geopolitical aftermath of the attacks.

This shift doesn't mean conservatives are forgetting or downplaying the nature of the 9/11 attacks. Instead, it represents a maturation of our collective response. By concentrating on the human element – the lives lost and the families forever changed – we honor the victims in a way that transcends political divisions and speaks to our shared American values.

The recent tragic loss of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has further underscored the need for unity and reflection in our political discourse. While the circumstances differ, the shock of losing a prominent voice in the conservative movement has reminded many of the sudden, profound loss experienced on 9/11. This parallel has strengthened the resolve of many conservatives to approach national tragedies with empathy and a focus on community healing.

For collegiate conservatives, this evolving perspective offers an opportunity to lead with compassion while maintaining core conservative principles. It allows for a more nuanced understanding of national security that balances vigilance with empathy. By emphasizing prayer and support for 9/11 families, young conservatives can demonstrate that strength comes not just from military might, but from the bonds of community and shared values.

This approach also aligns with traditional conservative values of family, faith, and community. By focusing on these aspects, we can honor the memory of 9/11 in a way that strengthens the fabric of our society rather than dwelling on division and fear.

As we move forward, it's crucial to remember that this shift in focus doesn't mean forgetting the lessons of 9/11. Rather, it's about applying those lessons in a way that brings healing and unity to our nation. By praying for and supporting the families affected by 9/11, we not only honor the memory of those lost but also reaffirm our commitment to the American spirit of resilience and compassion.

In conclusion, the conservative movement's evolving perspective on 9/11 represents a mature, thoughtful approach to national remembrance. By focusing on prayer and support for affected families, we can honor the past while building a stronger, more united future. This is not just a conservative ideal, but an American one – a testament to our ability to grow, heal, and come together in the face of tragedy.

Charlie Kirk: game-Changer in Conservative Activism

#nowplaying - Aaliyah - try again

written by a member of the WCB

In the landscape of American conservative activism, few figures have left as indelible a mark as Charlie Kirk. His untimely and tragic death on September 10, 2025, at the young age of 31, has sent shockwaves through the political world, leaving a void in the conservative movement that will be challenging to fill.

Rise of a Conservative Firebrand

Charlie Kirk burst onto the political scene with a fervor and dedication rarely seen in someone so young. At just 18 years old, he founded Turning Point USA, an organization that would grow to become one of the most influential conservative student groups in the country. Kirk’s vision was clear: to spread conservative ideas on college campuses and engage young people in political discourse.

Redefining Conservative Outreach

What set Kirk apart was his innate understanding of how to reach and mobilize the youth vote. In an era where social media became increasingly crucial in shaping political narratives, Kirk was a master of the medium. With millions of followers across platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok, he wielded significant influence in the digital sphere.

Kirk’s approach was multifaceted:

1. Campus Engagement: Through Turning Point USA, he organized events and debates on college campuses, challenging the perceived liberal bias in higher education.

2. Social Media Mastery: His adept use of social platforms allowed him to reach millions with conservative messages packaged for a younger audience.

3. Media Presence: As a frequent guest on conservative news outlets, Kirk became a recognizable face and voice for the movement.

Trump Era and Beyond

Kirk’s rise coincided with the political ascendancy of Donald Trump, and he quickly became one of Trump’s most ardent supporters. Trump himself credited Kirk with galvanizing and mobilizing the youth vote in his favor, a testament to Kirk’s impact on modern conservative politics.

As the Republican Party underwent a transformation under Trump, Kirk embodied the party’s shift towards populist conservatism. He was not afraid to tackle controversial topics and often spoke about politics in stark, even apocalyptic terms, viewing political contests as “spiritual battles” that would define the future of the nation.

Legacy of Controversy and Influence

Kirk’s career was not without controversy. His provocative statements and confrontational style often drew criticism from opponents. However, even his detractors could not deny his effectiveness in energizing young conservatives and bringing them into the political fold.

In his later years, Kirk increasingly embraced religious themes in his messaging, aligning with the Christian nationalist movement and calling on believers to exert influence across various sectors of society.

Tragic End and Immediate Impact

The circumstances of Kirk’s death—shot while speaking at an event at Utah Valley University—have added a layer of shock and disbelief to the loss felt by his supporters. The outpouring of condolences from across the political spectrum, including from President Trump and Vice President JD Vance, underscores the impact Kirk had on American politics.

Remembering Charlie Kirk

As we reflect on Charlie Kirk’s legacy, it’s clear that he was more than just a political activist. He was a transformative figure who reshaped how conservative ideas were communicated to younger generations. His ability to connect with and mobilize young conservatives will likely be studied and emulated for years to come.

Kirk’s passing at such a young age leaves us to wonder what more he might have accomplished. However, the movement he built and the countless young activists he inspired ensure that his influence will continue to be felt in American politics for generations.

In the end, Charlie Kirk will be remembered as a firebrand who changed the game of conservative activism, leaving behind a legacy that is both complex and undeniably impactful.